F30/F31/F32/F33 Review




Дата канвертавання19.04.2016
Памер34.59 Kb.


F30/F31/F32/F33 Review

If you cannot access the hyperlinks below,

visit http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/critiques/f.htm.

Application #:



Applicant:

Overall Impact


Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood that the fellowship will enhance the candidate’s potential for, and commitment to, a productive independent scientific research career in a health-related field, in consideration of the following scored and additional review criteria. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major impact.

Overall Impact/Merit Write a paragraph summarizing the factors that informed your Overall Impact score.






Scored Review Criteria


Reviewers will consider each of the five review criteria below in the determination of scientific and technical merit, and give a separate score for each.

1. Fellowship Applicant

Strengths



Weaknesses






2. Sponsors, Collaborators, and Consultants

Strengths



Weaknesses






3. Research Training Plan

Strengths



Weaknesses






4. Training Potential

Strengths



Weaknesses






5. Institutional Environment & Commitment to Training

Strengths



Weaknesses





Additional Review Criteria


As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider the following additional items in the determination of scientific and technical merit, but will not give separate scores for these items.

Protections for Human Subjects



Comments (Required Unless Not Applicable):



  •      

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (Applicable for Clinical Trials Only):



Comments (Required Unless Not Applicable):



    •      




Inclusion of Women, Minorities and Children Applicable Only for Human Subjects research and not IRB Exemption #4.

  • Sex/Gender: 

  • Race/Ethnicity: 

  • Inclusion/Exclusion of Children under 21: 

Comments (Required Unless Not Applicable):

  •      




Vertebrate Animals

Is the proposed research involving vertebrate animals scientifically appropriate, including the justification for animal usage and protections for research animals described in the Vertebrate Animal section?



Comments (Required Unless Not Applicable):



  •      




Biohazards



Comments (Required Unless Not Applicable):



  •      



Resubmission

Comments (if applicable):

  •      



Renewal

Comments (if applicable):

  •      


Additional Review Considerations


As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will address each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.


Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research



Comments on Format (Required):



  •      

Comments on Subject Matter (Required):

  •      

Comments on Faculty Participation (Required):

  •      

Comments on Duration (Required):

  •      

Comments on Frequency (Required):

  •      




Applications from Foreign Organizations



Comments (Required Unless Not Applicable):



  •      



Select Agents



Comments (Required Unless Not Applicable):



  •      




Resource Sharing Plans



Comments (Required):



  •      




Budget and Period of Support



Recommended budget modifications or possible overlap identified:



  •      



Additional Comments to Applicant


Reviewers may provide guidance to the applicant or recommend against resubmission without fundamental revision.

Additional Comments to Applicant (Optional)

  •      


F Critique Template Last Updated April 30, 2014 Page of


База данных защищена авторским правом ©shkola.of.by 2016
звярнуцца да адміністрацыі

    Галоўная старонка