E tg/166/4(proj. 3) Original




старонка5/5
Дата канвертавання25.04.2016
Памер476.87 Kb.
1   2   3   4   5

9.Literature


Bernáth, J., Dános, B., Veres, T., Tétényi, P., 1988: “Variation and alkaloid production in poppy ecotypes: Responses to different environments”. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 16 (2): pp. 171-178
Bernáth, J., 1998: “Poppy, The Genus Papaver”, Harwood Academic Publishers
Biomed. Chromatogr., 2001,15,45.

Biomed. Chromatogr., 2002,16,390.


Günther, K.F., 1975: “Beiträge zur Morphologie der Papaveraceae”. Flora 164: pp. 415-418.
Kodaira, H., and Spector, S., 1988: “Transformation of thebaine to orpavine, codeine and morphine by rat liver, kidney and brain microsomes”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: pp.1267-1271
Hammer, K., 1981: “Probleme der Klassifikation von Papaver somniferum”, Kulturpflanze 29: pp. 287-296.
Schijfsma, L., Hoesbergen, M. and Nijdam, F.E., 1960: “A Study of the Colour and Other Characters of the Seed in Some Varieties of Oil Seed Poppy”. Euphytica 9: pp. 127-140.
ST/SOA/SER. Y./33 UN Method No. 33, Dec. 16, 1977: “Determination of Phenanthreene Alkaloids in Papaver Somniferum Capsules and Papaver Bracteatum Plant Tissue By High Performance Liquid Chromatography”.
Tétényi, P., 1997: “Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum) Botany and Horticulture”. Horticultural Reviews, 19: pp. 373-408

10.Technical Questionnaire




TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE


Page {x} of {y}


Reference Number:

















Application date:









(not to be filled in by the applicant)

TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE



to be completed in connection with an application for plant breeders’ rights












1. Subject of the Technical Questionnaire










1.1 Botanical name

Papaver somniferum L.













1.2 Common name

Opium/Seed Poppy






















2. Applicant










Name
















Address















Telephone No.
















Fax No.
















E-mail address
















Breeder (if different from applicant)































3. Proposed denomination and breeder’s reference










Proposed denomination







(if available)








Breeder’s reference

























#4. Information on the breeding scheme and propagation of the variety
4.1 Method of propagating the variety
4.1.1 Seed-propagated varieties
(a) Self-pollination [ ]

(b) Cross-pollination

(i) population [ ]

(ii) synthetic variety [ ]

(c) Hybrid [ ]

(d) Other [ ]

(please provide details)




5. Characteristics of the variety to be indicated (the number in brackets refers to the corresponding characteristic in Test Guidelines; please mark the note which best corresponds).






Characteristics

Example Varieties

Note

5.1
(2)


Rosette leaf: white spots







absent

Botond, Buddha, Major

1[ ]



present

Kozmosz, Orel, Racek, Sokol

9[ ]

5.2
(10)


Petal: color







white

Botond, Korona, Major, Sokol

1[ ]



light pink

Agat

2[ ]



medium pink

Albín, Rosemarie, Rubin

3[ ]



dark pink

Edel-Rot

4[ ]



red

Danish Flag

5[ ]



light violet

Kozmosz

6[ ]



medium violet

Leila

7[ ]



dark violet

Zeno 2002

8[ ]

5.3
(11)


Petal: blotch







none

TMO1, Afyon 95, Ofis 96

1[ ]



entire blotch

Botond, Malsar, Rosemarie, Sokol

2[ ]



band



3[ ]



radial stripes



4[ ]

5.4
(18)


Capsule: shape of longitudinal section







oblate

Botond

1[ ]



truncate

Kék Gemona, Korona

2[ ]



round

Postomi

3[ ]



elliptic

Minoán

4[ ]



conical

Major, Opal

5[ ]

5.5
(23)


Capsule: dehiscence







indehiscent

Botond, Kék Gemona, Major

1[ ]



dehiscent

Edel-Rot, Edel-Weiss

2[ ]



Characteristics

Example Varieties

Note

5.6
(27)


Seed: color







white

Albín, KP Albakomp, Orel, Racek, Sokol

1[ ]



yellowish brown



2[ ]



brown

Redy

3[ ]



pink



4[ ]



grey

Edel-Rot, Edel-Weiss, Florian

5[ ]



light bluish

Minoán

6[ ]



medium bluish

Agat, Morwin, Opal

7[ ]



dark bluish

Botond, Buddha, Madrigal

8[ ]

5.7
(29)


Capsule: morphine content







very low

Mieszko, Zeno Morphex

1[ ]



very low to low



2[ ]



low

Albín, Kék Duna, Redy

3[ ]



low to medium



4[ ]



medium

Bergam, Major, Opal

5[ ]



medium to high



6[ ]



high

Postomi

7[ ]



high to very high



8[ ]



very high

Botond, Buddha

9[ ]

6. Similar varieties and differences from these varieties


Please use the following table and box for comments to provide information on how your candidate variety differs from the variety (or varieties) which, to the best of your knowledge, is (or are) most similar. This information may help the examination authority to conduct its examination of distinctness in a more efficient way.


Denomination(s) of variety(ies) similar to your candidate variety

Characteristic(s) in which your candidate variety differs from the similar variety(ies)

Describe the expression of the characteristic(s) for the similar variety(ies)

Describe the expression of the characteristic(s) for your candidate variety

Example

Petal: color of blotch

medium violet

dark violet

























Comments:

#7. Additional information which may help in the examination of the variety
7.1 In addition to the information provided in sections 5 and 6, are there any additional characteristics which may help to distinguish the variety?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
(If yes, please provide details)

7.2 Are there any special conditions for growing the variety or conducting the examination?


Yes [ ] No [ ]
(If yes, please provide details)

7.3 Other information


7.3.1 Resistance to pests and diseases
7.3.2 Special conditions for the examination of the variety
(a) Growing season:

  • spring [ ]

  • autumn [ ]

(b) Other conditions



8. Authorization for release
(a) Does the variety require prior authorization for release under legislation concerning the protection of the environment, human and animal health?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
(b) Has such authorization been obtained?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
If the answer to (b) is yes, please attach a copy of the authorization.

9. Information on plant material to be examined or submitted for examination.


9.1 The expression of a characteristic or several characteristics of a variety may be affected by factors, such as pests and disease, chemical treatment (e.g. growth retardants or pesticides), effects of tissue culture, different rootstocks, scions taken from different growth phases of a tree, etc.
9.2 The plant material should not have undergone any treatment which would affect the expression of the characteristics of the variety, unless the competent authorities allow or request such treatment. If the plant material has undergone such treatment, full details of the treatment must be given. In this respect, please indicate below, to the best of your knowledge, if the plant material to be examined has been subjected to:
(a) Microorganisms (e.g. virus, bacteria, phytoplasma) Yes [ ] No [ ]
(b) Chemical treatment (e.g. growth retardant, pesticide) Yes [ ] No [ ]
(c) Tissue culture Yes [ ] No [ ]
(d) Other factors Yes [ ] No [ ]
Please provide details for where you have indicated “yes”.
……………………………………………………………



10. I hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge, the information provided in this form is correct:
Applicant’s name
Signature Date



[End of document]

* These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.]

#Authorities may allow certain of this information to be provided in a confidential section of the Technical Questionnaire.

#Authorities may allow certain of this information to be provided in a confidential section of the Technical Questionnaire.

1   2   3   4   5


База данных защищена авторским правом ©shkola.of.by 2016
звярнуцца да адміністрацыі

    Галоўная старонка