Data set for resource value vs male reproductive success



старонка1/4
Дата25.04.2016
Памер320.3 Kb.
#32213
  1   2   3   4

S3. Data set for resource value vs. male reproductive success.

Effect size (r) and sample size (N) for relationship between value of resource (RV) and male mating/reproductive success (RS) as well as the resource character category, taxon and type of study (O = observation; E = experiment).

Species

Measure of resource value

Resource value category

Measure of male RS

N

r

Type of study

Reference

Amphibians






















Rana catesbeiana

low predation risk for embryos

quality

observed copulations

26

0.67

O

Howard (1978b)

Rana catesbeiana

low embryo abnormalities

quality

observed copulations

23

0.29

O

Howard (1978b)

Rana clamitans

territory quality score

quality

observed egg masses

21

0.58

E

Wells (1977)

Rana clamitans

adjusted territory quality score

quality

observed egg masses

21

0.77

E

Wells (1977)

Rana clamitans

territory quality score

quality

observed egg masses

25

0.56

E

Wells (1977)

Rana clamitans

adjusted territory quality score

quality

observed egg masses

25

0.62

E

Wells (1977)

Birds






















Acrocephalus arundinaceus

reduced nest predation

quality

female settlement

96

0.03

E

Hansson et al. (2000)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

harem size

13

0.54

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

harem size

24

0.55

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

harem size

29

0.37

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

harem size

18

0.34

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

harem size

23

-0.08

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

no. of fledglings

13

0.66

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

no. of fledglings

24

0.51

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

no. of fledglings

29

0.36

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

no. of fledglings

18

0.41

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

no. of fledglings

23

0.01

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

no. offspring recruits

13

0.22

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

no. offspring recruits

24

0.52

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

no. offspring recruits

29

0.31

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

no. offspring recruits

18

0.12

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

duration of occupation

quality

no. offspring recruits

23

0.33

O

Hasselquist (1998)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

edge length

quality

harem size

37

0.63

O

Catchpole (1986)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

edge length

quality

no. eggs

37

0.63

O

Catchpole (1986)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

edge length

quality

no. of young

37

0.08

O

Catchpole (1986)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

edge length

quality

no. of young

32

0.47

O

Catchpole (1986)

Acrocephalus arundinaceus

edge length

quality

no. of young

25

0.06

O

Catchpole (1986)

Agelaius phoeniceus

territory area

size

harem size

54

0.23

O

Yasukawa (1981)

Agelaius phoeniceus

area of nesting area

quality

harem size

54

0.13

O

Yasukawa (1981)

Agelaius phoeniceus

area of non-nesting area

quality

harem size

54

0.42

O

Yasukawa (1981)

Agelaius phoeniceus

length of edge

quality

harem size

54

-0.02

O

Yasukawa (1981)

Agelaius phoeniceus

cattail cover

quality

harem size

54

0.21

O

Yasukawa (1981)

Agelaius phoeniceus

bulrush cover

quality

harem size

54

0.20

O

Yasukawa (1981)

Agelaius phoeniceus

bur reed cover

quality

harem size

54

-0.10

O

Yasukawa (1981)

Agelaius phoeniceus

reduced nest predation

quality

female settlement

14

0.08

E

Pribil & Searcy (2001)

Euplectes macrourus

length

size

number of nests

18

-0.24

O

Savalli (1994a)

Euplectes macrourus

mean grass height

quality

number of nests

18

-0.01

O

Savalli (1994a)

Euplectes macrourus

% grass cover

quality

number of nests

18

-0.03

O

Savalli (1994a)

Euplectes macrourus

Loudetia kagerensis

quality

number of nests

18

0.28

O

Savalli (1994a)

Euplectes macrourus

Hyparrhenia spp.

quality

number of nests

18

-0.18

O

Savalli (1994a)

Euplectes macrourus

length

size

number of nests

24

0.22

O

Savalli (1994a)

Euplectes macrourus

mean grass height

quality

number of nests

19

-0.49

O

Savalli (1994a)

Euplectes macrourus

% grass cover

quality

number of nests

20

-0.26

O

Savalli (1994a)

Euplectes macrourus

Loudetia kagerensis

quality

number of nests

20

-0.15

O

Savalli (1994a)

Euplectes macrourus

Hyparrhenia spp.

quality

number of nests

20

0.30

O

Savalli (1994a)

Ficedula hypoleuca

no. nests

size

female settlement

31

0.60

E

Dale & Slagsvold (1990)

Ficedula hypoleuca

no. nests

size

female settlement

31

0.48

E

Dale & Slagsvold (1990)

Lagopus lagopus scoticus

area

size

no. young reared

80

0.23

O

Miller & Watson (1978)

Lagopus lagopus scoticus

proportion as heather

quality

no. young reared

80

0.23

O

Miller & Watson (1978)

Lagopus lagopus scoticus

area

size

no. female mates

34

0.52

O

Miller & Watson (1978)

Lagopus lagopus scoticus

proportion as heather

quality

no. female mates

34

0.24

O

Miller & Watson (1978)

Phasianus colchicus

habitat index

quality

harem size

23

0.32

O

Göransson et al. (1990)

Phasianus colchicus

habitat index

quality

harem size

28

0.39

O

Grahn et al. (1993)

Promerops cafer

area

size

female fecundity

11

0.72

O

Calf et al. (2003)

Promerops cafer

area

size

fledgling success

11

0.74

O

Calf et al. (2003)

Promerops cafer

area

size

female fecundity

9

0.33

O

Calf et al. (2003)

Promerops cafer

area

size

fledgling success

9

0.33

O

Calf et al. (2003)


Каталог: esm -> art%3A10.1007%2Fs00265-007-0518-8 -> MediaObjects
esm -> Species name regenerating grassland, 267 plots
esm -> Climatic environmental conditions
esm -> Species pair
esm -> Electronic Supplement material Table historical changes in taxonomical status of Middle Asian taxa studied
esm -> Electronic supplementary material
esm -> List of plants producing nectar and the corresponding study nomenclature adapted according to
esm -> Esm table 1 Soil nutrient status (ppm) at the two study sites at McLaughlin Natural Reserve (mean ± 1 sd) Soil typenpk ca Mg Ca/Mg pH
esm -> Supplementary material
esm -> Title: Beaver-created habitat heterogeneity influences aquatic invertebrate assemblages in boreal Canada
MediaObjects -> Data set for male resource-holding potential vs male reproductive success


Поделитесь с Вашими друзьями:
  1   2   3   4




База данных защищена авторским правом ©shkola.of.by 2022
звярнуцца да адміністрацыі

    Галоўная старонка