Common Name: Methuselah’s beard, beard lichen
Scientific Name: Usnea longissima Ach.
Genus: Usnea Dill. ex Adans.
Usnea longissima is pale greenish or silvery-yellowish-green, fruticose and pendulous; main branches are cylindric, up to 3 meters or more in length and very rarely dividing, with numerous dense, short perpendicular side branches and fibrils of about equal length (3-40 mm). The cortex is smooth but disintegrating on the main stems, leaving rough patches of white medulla over the pinkish-to-brownish central cord. The unexposed central cord beneath the cortex is white (when exposed with a razor blade), but frequently turns pinkish or reddish brown in decorticate main branches. Papillae are lacking. Soredia or isidia occasionally form on the side branches (Brodo et al. 2001; McCune 2005, McCune & Geiser 1997). Apothecia are extremely rare; when present, they are disk-shaped, 1-3 (5) mm across, terminal on the ends of side branches, with numerous fibrils extending from the thalline margin (Keon 2002).
Central cord I+B. Cortex and medulla K-, C-, KC- PD- (with various
combinations of evernic, diffractaic, barbatic, and 4-O-demethylbarbatic
acids; sometimes with usnic acid only), rarely K+Y-O, PD+O (salacinic acid)(McCune 2005).
Usnea longissima is one of the most easily recognizable lichens. All Usnea species have a characteristic central axis, appearing like an elastic cord or cylindric rubber band in the center of the lichen thallus, which is surrounded by medulla and outer cortex. Other similar fruticose pendant genera, such as Alectoria and Ramalina, lack the diagnostic central cord of Usnea species.
Usnea longissima is distinguished from other Usnea species by the extremely long, mostly unbranched main strands, which have perpendicular side branches and fibrils, and a patchy surface due to the eroded cortex. Small specimens may be confused with other pendant Usnea species, but only U. longissima has a I+ violet or dark bluish central cord and eroding cortex (Brodo et al. 2001; McCune & Geiser 1997).
“Spanish moss” may be confused with U. longissima because both can festoon trees and shrubs with long billowing strands. However, Spanish moss is a epiphytic vascular plant common in the southeastern U.S., not a lichen. It lacks the characteristic central cord of Usnea.
“Alectoria sarmentosa contains usnic acid, giving it the same color as U. longissima. Typically their growth forms are very different, with A. sarmentosa being considerably shorter (to 40 cm long), more branched, and with fewer perpendicular side branches. It lacks the central cord which is diagnostic for all Usneas.” (Derr et al. 2003)
“Ramalina menziesii is sometimes mistaken for U. longissima, particularly thin coastal specimens that lack the characteristic netted morphology typical of the species.” (Derr et al. 2003). Usnea longissima is usually considerably longer, with strands growing over three meters long, where R. menziesii grows to one meter. Ramalina also lacks the central cord of Usnea, and typically has flattened portions of the thallus while Usnea is round in cross-section.
Keys to Identification of the Species
Useful dichotomous keys are available in Brodo et al. (2001), Goward (1999), and McCune & Geiser (1997). The most recent key by Bruce McCune key is presented in part in Appendix 1, and available in its entirety online (McCune 2005).
This lichen has a large thallus that is identifiable year-round. It typically festoons trees with many long, draping strands, making it one of the most noticeable lichens, unless visibility is impeded by snow cover or inclement weather. Small, isolated specimens may be less readily observed. Reproductive structures are not necessary for accurate identification.
It is not typically fertile, since apothecia are extremely rare (Keon 2002). Soredia are infrequent in western North American specimens (Brodo et al. 2001, Keon & Muir 2002). This species primarily reproduces asexually by fragmentation of the main thallus, side branches and fibrils (Keon 2002). The relatively large size of the propagules indicates an inherent dispersal limitation, with the majority of vegetative propagules dispersing only short distances, (i.e. typically less than 5 meters) from their source locations (Esseen 1985, Esseen et al. 1981; Keon & Muir 2002).
Range, Distribution, and Abundance:
Historically, this taxon was fairly common and nearly circumboreal in distribution, occurring in eastern and western North America, Scandinavia, Europe, Asia (including China, Indonesia, India, and Bhutan) and Africa (Keon 2002). However, it has declined significantly throughout its global range. It is now endangered or extirpated from many areas of Europe and Scandinavia, due to a combination of human influences such as habitat alteration and air quality degradation (Derr et al. 2003). It was recently placed on the Red List of California Lichens, where it is considered rare (Doell & Wright 2000).
In western North America, U. longissima occurs from northern California north to Alaska (Brodo et al. 2001). In Washington, it is found in the Western Lowlands, Western Cascades, and the Olympic Peninsula Physiographic Provinces, only in and west of the Cascade Range. In Oregon, it occurs in the Willamette Valley, Western Cascades, Klamath, and Coast Range Physiographic Provinces, also west of the Cascade Range.
Within its range, it has a limited and patchy distribution on both the forest stand and landscape level (Keon & Muir 2002). It may be abundant on one to several trees in close proximity, but absent or infrequent through the surrounding stand. The reasons for this patchiness may be from dispersal limitations inherent to the species, difficulty with establishment, lack of suitable habitat, or a combination of factors. Current research suggests that the species is strongly dispersal-limited (Keon & Muir 2002, Sillet et al. 2000).
Usnea longissima occurs in old-growth and late-successional conifer stands, hardwood stands, and riparian areas, particularly in coastal climates or on fog-swept mountains where humidity is high. It is usually infrequent but can be locally abundant.
In the Oregon Coast Range, where extensive growth and habitat studies of U. longissima have been conducted (Keon & Muir 2002; Keon 2002; Keon 2001), it reachs its greatest biomass in old-growth/late-successional stands on upper slopes or ridges. Based on presence/absence habitat studies, stand ages greater than 120 years with north to northeast-facing slopes were predicted to be the most suitable habitat (Keon 2001).
In a study which took place on seven Pacific Northwest forests (Umpqua, Willamette, Mt. Hood, Deshutes, Gifford-Pinchot, Siuslaw, and Winema,), U. longissima was found three times as often in stands greater than or equal to 80 years old than those less than 80 years (Edwards et al. 2004). However, this association with older stand ages was not statistically significant, possibly due to the small number of observations (Edwards et al. 2004).
Experiments using U. longissima revealed that thalli transplanted into habitat predicted to be least suitable (i.e. very young clear cut stands) actually increased in biomass more than transplants into old-growth (Keon & Muir 2002). This suggests that the presence of a nearby propagule source may be more important to dispersal and survival at both the local and landscape level than habitat characteristics (Keon & Muir 2002). However, most naturally occurring U. longissima populations occur in older, moist forests rather than very young stands.
“In California, U. longissima is distributed for the most part in old growth
forests in the same ecological zone as the redwoods, although it does not
necessarily grow on that substrate (Doell & Wright 2000). U. longissima is
found in the coastal mountains north of San Francisco, less than forty
kilometers inland, at lower elevations (up to at least 2700 feet) where the climate is cool and moist (Doell & Wright 2000). It may reach as far inland as
48 km in river canyons like the Van Duzen that receive a lot of coastal fog (D.
Wright pers. comm.). Substrates include conifers, hardwoods and shrubs.” (Derr et al. 2003)
Additional site-specific habitat information can be found in the National Air Quality Database (U.S. Department of Agriculture 2006a).
Usnea longissima is a pollution-sensitive lichen (McCune & Geiser 1997); it is considered “most sensitive” by the National Air Quality Database (U.S. Department of Agriculture 2006b). It was abundant throughout the Northwest and Europe prior to industrialization; it has been extirpated from most of its former range in Europe, with rare populations remaining in Italy and Norway.
Historic and current illegal harvesting for floral shops, other decorative uses, and medicinals may also contribute to the declining abundance of this species.
Forest management practices may threaten existing populations directly by harvest of host trees. Additional loss of populations, loss of suitable habitat, and forest fragmentation would increase the already large distances between existing populations. Since this species is notoriously slow to disperse and establish in new locations, forest management practices may slow recovery time.
Current research indicates that the retention of U. longissima host trees during tree harvest will benefit the species. Remnant trees (both conifers and hardwoods) function as sources of inoculum from which lichen propagules can disperse, and can serve as important “hotspots” of lichen diversity and abundance (Keon & Muir 2002, Peck & McCune 1997, Peterson & McCune 2003).
“This species is dispersal-limited at both stand and landscape levels across the Pacific Northwest (McCune & Geiser 1997, Sillett et al. 2000). Studies suggest that the presence of populations in old-growth (i.e. tall) stands increases the possibility of dispersal and establishment of U. longissima onto adjacent substrates in suitable habitat, especially adjacent tree crowns where the species is most effective at continuing to disperse to other suitable habitats (Keon & Muir 2002, Keon 2001). The finding that U. longissima transplants thrive in habitat that was predicted to be the least suitable (i.e. clear cuts) also suggests that dispersal limitations play a more significant role than the availability of suitable habitat in determining this species’ distribution, and highlights the important role of colonized green-tree retention in timber harvest areas (Keon & Muir 2002, Keon 2001).” (Derr et al. 2003)
U. S. Department of the Interior; U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service; U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Survey Protocols for Survey and Manage Category A & C Lichens in the Pacific Northwest Forest Plan Area (Version 2.1). Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Region 6. Available in hardcopy and online: http://www.blm.gov/or/plans/surveyandmanage/SP/Lichens/20030609/Lichens%20Version%202.1.pdf. [Accessed July 28, 2006].
USDA Forest Service. 2006. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Phase 3 measurements for 2006 field season (formerly known as Forest Health Detection Monitoring plots). Section 10. Lichen Communities. Available online: http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/field-guides-methods-proc/docs/2006/p3_3-0_sec10_10_2005.pdf. [Accessed 28 July 2006].
Preparers: Jeanne Ponzetti & Erika Wittmann
Date completed: 9/18/2006
Key to Identification of the Species
List of References
Map of Range and Distribution in Oregon and Washington
Attachment 1 - Key to Identification of the Species
Usnea in the Pacific Northwest (McCune 2005)
By Bruce McCune, March 22, 2005
The species concepts in the key below were revised based primarily on Halonen et al. (1998), Halonen
(2000), and Tavares (1997); also see other references.
1a Cortex or central cord distinctly reddish, brown, yellow, or blackening
Group 1, Lead 7
1b Cortex yellow green to green and central cord white
2a Thallus pendulous, often long, typically > 12 cm
Group 2, Lead 12
2b Thallus tufted, ± erect or drooping, typically < 12 cm
3a Thallus with sparse to abundant apothecia; soredia and isidia lacking
Group 3, Lead 24
3b Thallus with few or no apothecia; soredia and/or isidia usually present
4a Branches pinched at the nodes and slightly to distinctly expanded in the internodes, so that
individual branch segments are cigar shaped
Group 4, Lead 30
4b Branches cylindrical
Group 5, Lead 40
12a Base blackened; cortex with abundant annular cracks, especially at the base; cortex thick (10-20% of
radius); medulla compact, thin (7-15% of radius); soralia typically larger than ½ of the branch diameter,
isidiate at least when young. Thallus pendent to subpendent, rarely shrubby, to 25 cm long; fibrils and
papillae variable, but papillae usually indistinct; branching mainly isotomic dichotomous but becoming
anisotomic near the tips; soralia often numerous, distinctly raised, closely spaced to confluent,
occasionally absent or sparse; medulla K+Y or R, P+Y or O, with salacinic acid and accessory
protocetraric and constictic acids, rarely with accessory barbatic acid; on conifers, hardwoods, and
shrubs; common in oceanic areas from Calif to BC, usually found near the coast, sometimes in the Coast
Ranges, sporadic in the Willamette-Puget trough
U. silesiaca Motyka
U. madeirensis Motyka
[Halonen et al. (1997) and Halonen (2000) use the name U. madeirensis. Tavares (1997) asserted that U.
silesiaca is the correct name; an attempt to conserve U. madeirensis against U. silesiaca failed (Clerc
12b Base blackened or not, but if blackened, then with fewer annular cracks; cross section and propagules
13a Papillae lacking
14a Main branches very long, rarely dividing, with dense short perpendicular fibrils; central strand
of main branches > 0.5X thickness of branches; central axis I+B. Thallus commonly very long
(to >> 1 m), cortex eroded on the main branches; soredia occasionally present; central axis
white but occasionally turning pinkish or reddish brown in decorticate branches; apothecia
rare; cortex and medulla K-, C-, P- (with various combinations of evernic, diffractaic, barbatic,
and 4-O-demethylbarbatic acids; sometimes with usnic acid only), rarely K+Y-O, P+O (salacinic
acid); on both conifers and hardwoods, frequently in riparian areas but also on fog-swept
ridges; locally common in moist low-elevation coastal forests; Alaska to Calif in the coastal
states and provinces
U. longissima Ach.
[This species shows rich chemical variation in the Pacific Northwest. In BC (Halonen et al.
1998) evernic acid was most frequent, followed by barbatic acid); the various chemotypes were
recognized as species by Asahina, but these have largely been ignored because the specimens
are otherwise indistinguishable morphologically]
14b Main branches often rebranching, fibrils absent to moderate; central strand of main branches <
0.5X thickness of the branch; central axis I-
15a Main branches becoming strongly pitted (foveolate) and ridged, bluntly angular in crosssection. Thallus sometimes long (to 30 cm), soft, sparsely branched; soredia and isidia lacking; central strand and terminal branches ± sinuous; fibrils lacking or very sparse; apothecia rare; medulla I-, usually K+Y to O and P+O (with salazinic acid), rarely with only usnic acid (K-, P-); usually on conifers; widespread, boreal south in mountains to Ariz, Calif, and Mex; uncommon and scattered in PNW
U. cavernosa Tuck.
15b Main branches not or only weakly pitted
16a Main branches ridged or wrinkled; isidia usually abundant; papillae often present but weakly developed; annular cracks few U. scabrata (see below)
16b Main branches smooth, cylindrical; isidia and soralia sparse to almost lacking; annular cracks common.
17a Base slightly to distinctly blackened; papillae usually present, though often sparse and low; medulla usually containing salacinic acid (K+Y to R, P+O), rarely with usnic acid only (K-, P-);cortex moderately thick (___% of radius); medulla ___?___ and compact (____% of radius); axis ____ (_____% of diameter). Thallus often 30 cm or more long; sometimes resembling Alectoria; usually with abundant slender branches but never with abundant fibrils; soralia absent to scattered, usually minute, borne on small tubercles; isidia usually absent but occasionally present. Usually on conifers; uncommon to locally common in the Coast Ranges and Cascades at low to middle elevations; BC (and probably Alaska) to Oregon
U. chaetophora Stirton
17b Base not blackened; papillae absent; cortex relatively thick (8-14% of radius); medulla thin and compact (6-16% of radius); axis thick (43-64% of diameter); medulla K+Y or K-, P+R (protocetraric acid with accessory compounds in the stictic acid group). Thallus to 50 cm long or more, sometimes resembling Alectoria; fibrils absent to abundant; cortex matte; soralia absent to abundant, minute; isidia absent to sparse, soon abraded; usually on conifers near the coast
U. schadenbergiana Göpp. & Stein
U. hesperina Motyka
U. subgracilis Vainio
[See Clerc’s (2004) nomenclatural conclusion regarding loss of the
familiar name U. hesperina.]
13b Papillae present
18a Branches with abundant annular cracks (typically 6-15 cracks per cm) that sometimes expose
the medulla; papillae usually sparse and low, mainly on the thickest branches; soralia absent to
scattered, usually minute.
U. chaetophora (see above)
18b Branches with few annular cracks (0-8 per cm), those present mainly near the base
19a Main branches with raised wrinkles which may be widely scattered or dense and
reticulating with intervening flat or depressed spots; branches uneven in thickness,
swollen, often sinuose; cortex thin (2-8% of radius). Thallus to 50 cm long; main branches often with few fibrils (but sometimes heavily fibrillose); branches with raised warts that become isidiate; papillae usually weakly developed; medulla usually lax, K+Y to O (salacinic acid) or K- (usnic acid only); widespread, boreal and montane; mesic montane forests, with more old-growth affinity than U. filipendula
U. scabrata Nyl. sens. lat.
(including U. alpina Motyka, U. barbata (L.) F. H. Wigg., U. catenulata Motyka, ? U.
graciosa Motyka, ? U. intermedia (Mass.) Jatta, U. prostrata Räsänen, U. scabiosa
Motyka, U. sylvatica Motyka)
["a highly polymorphic species in which many intergrading morphotypes occur. These
polymorphic characters, which are seemingly controlled mostly by environmental
parameters, include the morphology of the papillae, the occurrence of foveoles, the
density of branching and fibrils, and the thickness of the branches" (Halonen et al. 1998).
Furthermore, they relegated U. scabiosa Motyka to a synonym of U. scabrata: "described
from New Mexico, has a rugose, abundantly foveolate thallus and it probably represents
U. scabrata sens. str." Tavares (1997), however, stated "these species are very distinct
and do not seem to be closely related." Tavares separated U. scabiosa as having
"papillae short, think, cylindrical or slightly tapered" vs. "papillae usually tall and
cylindrical" for U. scabrata and U. filipendula. The usnic-only chemotype is more
common inland (this has been called U. scabrata ssp. nylanderiana Motyka) while west
of the Cascades the salacinic chemotype is most common. Tavares (1997) also separates
the U. pendulina - U. graciosa group as having distinctly inflated branch segments and
sinuose fibrils, with small, thin, low papillae and cross-sectional proportions about the
same as U. scabrata. She stated "California specimens allied to U. pendulina Motyka,
described from Italy, and U. graciosa Motyka, described from Sweden, include some
individuals with strongly fusiform segments that may belong to a distinct taxon."]
19b Main branches cylindrical throughout, not ridged; cortex moderately thick (8-14% of
20a Fibrils usually abundant; papillae usually tall, cylindrical, and abundant; isidio-soralia tuberculate, often arising from scars of detached fibrils; medulla K+Y-O, P+O (salacinic acid). Thallus to 60 cm long; base blackened or not; main branches with abundant papillae and tubercles, the latter producing isidia; isidia usually abundant; central axis rather thick (30-45% of diameter); medulla with salacinic acid (UV-, K+R, P+O) or usnic acid only (K-, P-). On both hardwoods and conifers in low to mid elevation forests, mainly in mesic to dryish sites west of the Cascades, mesic sites east of the Cascades; BC to California inland to w Montana
U. filipendula Stirton
[Other names that have been commonly applied in this group are U. plicata and U. dasypoga (Ach.) Shirley]
20b Fibrils absent to sparse; papillae short warty bumps; soralia plane to tuberculate, arising from small tubercles; medulla UV+ white, K-, P+Y (squamatic and baeomycesic acids)
U. pacificana (pendulous morphotype; see below)
References used in creation of McCune’s Usnea key:
Clerc, P. 1987a. Systematics of the Usnea fragilescens aggregate and its distribution in Scandinavia. Nordic Journal of Botany. 7: 479-495.
Clerc, P. 1987b. On the morphology of soralia in the genus Usnea. Pages 99-102 in: E. Peveling, ed. Progress and Problems in Lichenology in the Eighties. Bibliotheca Lichenologica No. 25. Berlin-Stuttgart: J. Cramer.
Clerc, P. 1991: Usnea madeirensis Mot. (ascomycète lichénisé): un espèce méconnue de l'Europe et de l'Amérique du Nord. Candollea. 46:427-438.
Clerc, P. 1998. Species concepts in the genus Usnea (lichenized Ascomycetes). Lichenologist. 30:321-340.
Clerc, P. 2004. Notes on the genus Usnea Adanson. Bibliotheca Lichenologica. 88:79-90.
Clerc, P. and P. Diederich. 1991. Usnea wirthii Clerc new to North America and the British Isles. Lichenologist. 23:405-407.
Clerc, P. and M. A. Herrera-Campos. 1997. Saxicolous species of Usnea subgenus Usnea (lichenized ascomycetes) in North America. The Bryologist. 100:281-301.
Halonen, P., P. Clerc, T. Goward, I. M. Brodo, & K. Wulff. 1998. Synopsis of the genus Usnea (Lichenized Ascomycetes) in British Columbia, Canada. The Bryologist. 101:36-60.
Halonen, P. 2000. Usnea pacificana sp. nov. and U. wasmuthii (Lichenized Ascomycetes) in Pacific North America. The Bryologist. 103:38-43.
Herrera-Campos, M. A. and P. Clerc. 1998. Pendulous species of Usnea from the temperate forests in Mexico. The Bryologist. 101:303-329.
Tavares, I. I. 1997. A preliminary key to Usnea in California. Bulletin of the California Lichen Society. 4:19-23.
Wright, D. 2001. Some species of the genus Usnea (lichenized Ascomycetes) in California. Bulletin of the California Lichen Society. 8(1):1-22.
Attachment 2 – List of References
Brodo, I., Sylvia Sharnoff, & Stephen Sharnoff. 2001. Lichens of North America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 795 p.
Derr, Chiska, Richard Helliwell, Andrea Ruchty, Lisa Hoover, Linda Geiser, David Lebo & John Davis. 2003. Survey Protocols for Survey and Manage Category A & C Lichens in the Northwest Forest Plan Area: Version 2.1. Portland, OR: U.S.D.A. Forest Service and U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management. BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/045+1792. Available in print and online at: http://www.blm.gov/nhp/efoia/or/fy2003/im/im-or-2003-078Att1.pdf
Doell, J. & D. Wright. 2000. Usnea longissima in California. Bulletin of the. California Lichen Society. Vol. 7(1):17-19.
Esslinger, T. L. 2006. A cumulative checklist for the lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada. North Dakota State University: http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/instruct/esslinge/chcklst/chcklst7.htm (First Posted 1 December 1997, Most Recent Update 10 April 2006), Fargo, North Dakota.
Esseen, P.-A. 1985. Litter fall of epiphytic macrolichens in two old Picea abies forests in Sweden. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 980-987.
Esseen, P.-A., L. Ericson, H. Lindström, & O. Zackrisson. 1981. Occurrence and ecology of Usnea longissima in central Sweden. Lichenologist 13: 177-190.
Goward, T. 1999. The lichens of British Columbia, Illustrated Keys. Part 2, Fruiticose Species. Special Report Series (British Columbia Ministry of Forests). 319 pp.
Keon, D.B. 2001. Factors limiting the distribution of the sensitive lichen Usnea longissima in the Oregon Coast Range: Habitat or dispersal? Portland, OR: Oregon State University. Thesis.
Keon, D.B. 2002. Fertile Usnea longissima in the Oregon Coast Range.
The Lichenologist. 34:13-17.
Keon, D.B. & P. S. Muir. 2002. Growth of Usnea longissima across a variety of
habitats in the Oregon Coast Range. The Bryologist. 105:233-242.
McCune, Bruce. [Date of publication unknown]. Listed Macrolichens in the Pacific Northwest. Available online: http://www.proaxis.com/~mccune/listed.htm. [Accessed May 19, 2006].
McCune, Bruce. 2005. Usnea in the Pacific Northwest. Available online: http://oregonstate.edu/~mccuneb/Usnea.PDF. [Accessed May 15, 2006].
McCune, Bruce, & Linda Geiser. 1997. Macrolichens of the Pacific Northwest. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press. 386 p.
Peck, J.E. & B. McCune. 1997. Remnant trees and canopy lichen communities in western Oregon: a retrospective approach. Ecological Applications 7: 1181-1187.
Peterson, Eric B., and B. McCune. 2003. The importance of hotspots for lichen diversity in forests of western Oregon. The Bryologist 106: 246-256.
Sillett, S.C., B. McCune, J.E. Peck, T.R. Rambo, & A. Ruchty. 2000. Dispersal limitations of epiphytic lichens result in species dependent on old-growth forests. Ecological Applications 10: 789799.
USDA, NRCS. 2006. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 6 August 2006). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2006a. Pacific Northwest Region Lichens and Air Quality. Lichen Community Data. U.S. Forest Service Region 6. Available online at: http://www.lichenair.nacse.org/cgi-bin/qml/usair/region6/area6.qml.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2006b. Pacific Northwest Region Lichens and Air Quality. Sensitivity Ratings. U.S. Forest Service Region 6. Available online at: http://airlichen.nacse.org/cgi-bin/qml/usair/sensitivity_images/index.html.
Attachment 3 - Map of Usnea longissima locations in Oregon and Washington from GeoBob database (Oct. 2006)
Attachment 4 - Photos
Photo © Stephen and Sylvia Sharnoff;
used with permission.
Photo © USFS Region 6