Myth vs. Fact: Stop Online Piracy Act Myth #1:SOPA allows the government to censor the Internet by prohibiting access to websites on the Internet. Fact:
SOPA does not censor legal activity on the Internet. It targets activity that is already illegal.
The bill helps stop illegal foreign websites from stealing and selling America’s technology and inventions, and keeping the profits for themselves.
The theft of America’s intellectual property costs the U.S. economy more than $100 billion annually and results in the loss of thousands of American jobs.
This bill targets foreign websites that are primarily engaged in illegal and infringing activity.
It’s not censorship to enforce the law and stop criminal activity online.
Myth #2: SOPA limits free speech on the Internet. Fact:
SOPA is a constitutional bill that protects free speech and America’s intellectual property.
The First Amendment is not an excuse for illegal activity. And simply because illegal activity occurs online does not mean that it is protected speech.
Like online piracy, child pornography is also offered online. It is also illegal. Just as there is no First Amendment right to offer or access obscenity online, there is no protected interest in offering illegal counterfeit and pirated products and services.
This bill authorizes only the Attorney General to seek an injunction against a foreign site that is dedicated to illegal and infringing activity.
This bill does not threaten the Internet as a tool of communication and commerce. But it does threaten the profits generated by foreign criminals who target the U.S. market and willfully steal intellectual property by trafficking in counterfeit or pirated goods.
Myth #3:SOPA will allow anyone to file a complaint against any website (even lawful websites) and have access to that site blocked. Fact:
Only the Justice Department is authorized under this bill to seek an injunction against a foreign website that is primarily dedicated to illegal activity.
The Justice Department must go to a federal judge and lay out the case against a foreign site.
If the judge finds that the site is primarily engaged in illegal activity, a court order can be issued that authorizes the Justice Department to request that the site be blocked.
Internet Service Providers and search engines will simply be required to filter access or remove the direct link to an illegal site so that it doesn’t come up as part of the search results.
Myth #4: SOPA will destroy social networking sites like Facebook and YouTube. It will even make it illegal for parents to post videos of their children singing songs by their favorite recording artists. Fact:
SOPA defines rogue sites as foreign websites that are primarily dedicated tothe illegal sale and distribution of counterfeit or pirated goods or foreign websites that market themselves as such.
Websites like Facebook and YouTube that host user content are not “primarily dedicated to” illegal activity and they do not market themselves as websites “primarily dedicated to” illegal activity.
It is not regulation to enforce the law on the Internet.
The Stop Online Piracy Act stops criminals from using the online global marketplace to profit from the sale and distribution of counterfeit American goods.
The bill does not regulate those engaged in lawful activity on the Internet. But it does help to cut off the flow of revenue to foreign criminals who hide behind the anonymity of the Internet to rob America’s innovators and job creators of their hard-earned profits.
Piracy and counterfeiting discourage innovation because they steal profits and revenues that rightfully belong to America’s innovators.
This bill protects financial incentives by ensuring that profits from America’s innovations go to American innovators. That encourages creativity and innovation, which leads to economic growth and job creation.
Myth #7: SOPA must be bad if Internet giants like Google oppose it. Fact:
Unfortunately, some critics of this bill have generated enormous profits from illegal websites that sell stolen intellectual property.
Google has directed consumers to these illegal sites by featuring them prominently on their search function. This includes sites with counterfeit drugs that could endanger the lives of consumers.
In August, Google paid $500 million dollars to settle a criminal case into the search engine giant’s active promotion of rogue foreign pharmacies that sold counterfeit and illegal drugs to U.S. patients. Google’s conduct demonstrates there is a need for the government to step up enforcement of intellectual property rights online and provide increased protections to American consumers.
American intellectual property industries provide 19 million high-paying jobs to the U.S. economy and account for more than 60 percent of U.S. exports. But the theft of America’s intellectual property costs the U.S. economy more than $100 billion annually.
Companies that care about American consumers and our economy should support legislation that protects American jobs and innovations.
It is clear that Google has a vested interest in opposing this legislation. That’s because they profit from doing business with online criminals who sell counterfeit goods.
Myth #8: SOPA allows Attorney General Eric Holder to “police” the Internet. Fact:
This bill does not give unilateral authority to the Justice Department to shut down foreign rogue websites.
Under the bill, the Justice Department must go to a federal court and lay out the case against a foreign infringing site. If a judge agrees that the site is an illegal and infringing rogue website, then a court order can be issued authorizing the Justice Department to seek to have the site blocked or have financial ties severed.
It’s ironic that opponents of the Stop Online Piracy Act express concern over DOJ’s role in the enforcement of intellectual property law,but have no problem giving President Obama the authority to pardon foreign rogue websites for mere ‘policy reasons.’
Sponsors of the OPEN Act seem fine with President Obama being able to use this authority at his political will, but are unwilling to trust the judiciary and federal courts who have handled intellectual property enforcement for decades.
Comments that the entire Justice Department cannot be trusted because of Attorney General Eric Holder demean the hard work of thousands of career prosecutors and attorneys-in-the-field who have no political, personal or professional affiliation with the Obama administration.
And frankly, under that same logic, if you don’t trust DOJ to handle intellectual property cases, why would you allow them to handle more pressing issues like terrorism and national security?
We have problems with Attorney General Eric Holder, to be sure.
But the Justice Department as a law enforcement entity is not defined by the Attorney General – it includes tens of thousands of federal investigators, FBI agents, prosecutors and law enforcement officials who serve our country with professionalism and distinction. Their service should not be me marred simply because of the Attorney General.
Myth #9: SOPA gives extraordinary new powers to the federal government. Fact:
This bill affords the same due process protections provided in all civil litigation in federal courts.
The Stop Online Piracy Act does not give unilateral authority to the Justice Department or ‘movie studios’ to shut down foreign rogue websites. On the contrary, the bill authorizes only the Justice Department to seek a court order to block a foreign infringing site. If a judge agrees, then a court order can be issued authorizing the Justice Department to seek to have the site blocked or have financial ties severed.
Freedom is impossible without the rule of law, and this bill ensures Americans are protected from foreign criminals on the Internet.
The Stop Online Piracy Act is not more ‘big government’ – it is more jobs for American workers and profits for American innovators.